Journal of Neuroscience and Clinical Neurology

Frequency : Bi-Annual (Two issues per year)
Editorial & Review Timeline
3 - 6 Days Initial Quality Review
30 Days Peer Evaluation Summary
45 - 60 Days Complete Editorial Processing Time

Editorial Board

Dr Oral Oncul
Dr Oral Oncul (PhD)

Editor-in-Chief

  Professor

  Infectious Diseases

  Istanbul University

  Turkey

Institutional Profile Link

Dr Mian Usman Sattar
Dr Mian Usman Sattar (PhD)

Editor-in-Chief

  Program Leader

  Computing and Engineering

  University of Derby

  United Kingdom

Institutional Profile Link

Dr Zhou Zhi Dong
Dr Zhou Zhi Dong (PhD)

Editor-in-Chief

  Assistant Professor

  Neuroscience

  Duke-NUS Medical School

  Singapore

Institutional Profile Link

Sir Prof Harry WM Steinbusch
Sir Prof Harry WM Steinbusch (PhD)

Editor-in-Chief

  Director

  Cellular and Translational Neuroscience

  Maastricht University

  Netherlands

Institutional Profile Link

Prof Francesco Inchingolo
Prof Francesco Inchingolo (MD)

Editor-in-Chief

  Full Professor

  Medicine

  University of Bari Aldo Moro

  Italy

Dr Kaouther Selmi
Dr Kaouther Selmi (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Assistant Professor

  Electronics and Computational Neuroscience

  University of Monastir

  Tunisia

Dr Simone Aloisio
Dr Simone Aloisio (MD)

Editor-Member

  Neurologist

  Human Neuroscience

  Sapienza University of Rome

  Italy

Tatia Aprasidze
Tatia Aprasidze (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Associated Professor

  Department of Medicine

  Georgian National University

  Georgia

Lucienne Costa Frossard Franca
Lucienne Costa Frossard Franca (MD)

Editor-Member

  Professor

  Neurology

  University of Alcala

  Spain

Maria del Carmen Rubio Osornio
Maria del Carmen Rubio Osornio (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Academic Leader

  Neurophysiology

  Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana

  Mexico

Institutional Profile Link

DrJuliet K Haarbauer-Krupa
DrJuliet K Haarbauer-Krupa (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Adjunct Faculty

  Department of Pediatrics

  Emory University School of Medicine

  USA

Kanchon Kumar Bishnu
Kanchon Kumar Bishnu (MS)

Editor-Member

  AI Research Scientist

  Department of Computer Science

  California State University, Los Angeles

  USA

Institutional Profile Link

Masoumeh Khalili
Masoumeh Khalili (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Postdoctoral Researcher

  Behavioral Neuropharmacology

  Fujita Health University

  Japan

Institutional Profile Link

Dr Mayur Bhimrao Kale
Dr Mayur Bhimrao Kale (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Assistant Professor

  Pharmacology

  Smt Kishoritai Bhoyar College of Pharmacy Kamptee

  India

Institutional Profile Link

Dr Panayiotis Vlamos
Dr Panayiotis Vlamos (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Professor

  Department of Informatics

  Ionian University

  Greece

Institutional Profile Link

About the Journal

Neuroscience and clinical neurology are closely linked fields that share a common focus on understanding and addressing disorders of the nervous system. Neuroscience is a research-based discipline that examines the structure and function of the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves, exploring how they operate at the molecular, cellular, and behavioral levels. This field aims to uncover how biological processes influence cognition, emotions, memory, and learning, and how these processes are disrupted in various neurological conditions. On the other hand, clinical neurology is a medical specialty that applies findings from neuroscience to the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders, such as stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and dementia. While neuroscience expands our understanding of how the nervous system works, clinical neurology uses this knowledge to improve patient care through more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. Together, they play a vital role in advancing the field of brain and nerve health, driving innovation in both research and clinical practice.

Authors are requested to submit manuscripts online at Submit Manuscript or Send as an e-mail attachment to the Editorial Office at editorialoffice@confseries.net

Editorial and Publication Process

ConfSeries Journals is committed to maintaining an efficient, transparent, and quality-focused editorial workflow to support the dissemination of scholarly research.

The journal aims to provide authors with a transparent and structured publication process while ensuring that all submissions undergo appropriate editorial assessment and peer review procedures. Editorial timelines may vary depending on the scope of the manuscript, reviewer availability, revision requirements, and the overall review process.

Authors may choose to publish through the journal's standard publication workflow, which includes editorial screening, peer review, revisions (where required), copyediting, and final publication.

All submissions are evaluated based on scientific quality, originality, ethical compliance, and relevance to the journal's scope. The editorial process is designed to maintain academic integrity and ensure consistency in publication standards.

Accepted manuscripts proceed through production stages including formatting, proof review, DOI assignment, and online publication.

Authors retain the copyright of their published work, and final articles are made available through the journal's open-access publishing model to support global accessibility and scholarly communication.

The journal publishes articles in digital formats suitable for online dissemination and digital accessibility, including PDF and other standard publishing formats where applicable.

The editorial team is committed to following recognized scholarly publishing practices and maintaining transparency throughout the publication process.

Our Peer Review Process

Confseries follows a structured editorial and peer-review process designed to ensure academic quality, ethical integrity, and timely publication. Each manuscript progresses through clearly defined stages,as illustrated in the peer review workflow.

Manuscript Submission
Authors submit their manuscripts through the Confseries submission platform. All submissions must comply with the journal's scope, author instructions, and ethical standards.

Editorial Office Initial Check
Each new submission undergoes an initial assessment by the editorial office to confirm:

  • Relevance to the journal's aims and scope
  • Completeness of required files and declarations
  • Compliance with formatting and submission guidelines
  • Originality through plagiarism screening
  • Absence of major ethical or legal concerns

Manuscripts identified with major plagiarism, duplicate submission, or serious ethical issues are rejected at this stage without external review. Submissions meeting basic requirements proceed to peer review.

Peer Review Initiation

After passing the initial screening:

  • A qualified editor is assigned to the manuscript
  • Independent reviewers are selected based on subject expertise
  • The manuscript is formally sent for peer evaluation
Confseries follows a single-anonymized peer review model to ensure objective and unbiased assessment.

Reviewer Assessment
Reviewers critically evaluate the manuscript focusing on:

  • Scientific originality and relevance
  • Methodological rigor and data integrity
  • Clarity of presentation and organization
  • Ethical compliance and reporting quality
Reviewers submit detailed comments and recommendations to support editorial decision-making.

Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer feedback and editorial evaluation, one of the following decisions is issued:

  • Accepted
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Rejected
Authors receive consolidated comments from both editors and reviewers explaining the decision.

Revision and Re-evaluation
For manuscripts requiring revision:

  • Authors submit a revised manuscript addressing all comments
  • A point-by-point response document is required
  • Major revisions may be reassessed by the original reviewers
Failure to adequately address concerns may result in rejection at this stage.

Acceptance and Publication
Manuscripts accepted for publication proceed to the production phase, which includes:

  • Copyediting and proofreading
  • DOI assignment
  • Final author approval
  • Online publication and dissemination

Ethical and Editorial Integrity

  • Ensuring fair and unbiased peer review
  • Maintaining strict confidentiality of submissions
  • Providing ethical oversight at every editorial stage
  • Ensuring transparent communication with authors with authors

The Confseries peer-review workflow reflects a clear, ethical, and structured editorial process, ensuring that every manuscript is evaluated rigorously before publication.