Journal of Integrative Psychiatric Medicine

Frequency : Bi-Annual (Two issues per year)
Editorial & Review Timeline
3 - 6 Days Initial Quality Review
30 Days Peer Evaluation Summary
45 - 60 Days Complete Editorial Processing Time

Editorial Board

Mateusz Grajek
Mateusz Grajek (PhD)

Editor-in-Chief

  Assistant Professor

  Public Health

  Medical University of Silesia

  Poland

Sam Vaknin
Sam Vaknin (PhD)

Editor-in-Chief

  Professor

  Professor of Psychology

  CIAPS Cambridge

  UK

Institutional Profile Link

Tzuhui Angie Tseng
Tzuhui Angie Tseng (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Professor

  Environmental

  National Tsing Hua University

  Taiwan

Institutional Profile Link

Tomasz Jurys
Tomasz Jurys (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Assistant Lecturer

  Rehabilitation

  Medical University of Silesia

  Poland

Hsien-Yuan Lane
Hsien-Yuan Lane (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Professor

  Psychiatry

  China Medical University

  Taiwan

Institutional Profile Link

Dr Roxana Plesa
Dr Roxana Plesa (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Lecturer

  Human Sciences

  University of Petrosani

  USA

Institutional Profile Link

Dr Tao Xu
Dr Tao Xu (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Professor

  Social Work

  Zhejiang Normal University

  China

Institutional Profile Link

Prof Sayed Ahmad Elwakeel
Prof Sayed Ahmad Elwakeel (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Professor

  Psychology

  Fayoum University

  Egypt

Dr Sakineh Shafia
Dr Sakineh Shafia (PhD)

Editor-Member

  Associate Professor

  Physiology

  Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

  Iran

About the Journal

The Journal of Integrative Psychiatric Medicine serves as a comprehensive platform for publishing scholarly work that advances understanding in the fields of psychiatry and mental health. This peer-reviewed, open-access journal is committed to disseminating high-quality research on a wide range of topics, including mood and anxiety disorders, psychotic and personality disorders, neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative conditions, and substance use disorders. It emphasizes clinical relevance, focusing on studies that explore the biological, psychological, and socio-environmental factors influencing mental health. In addition to original research articles, the journal publishes case reports, reviews, editorials, and short communications that contribute to improving diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and policymaking in mental healthcare. With an interdisciplinary approach, the journal aims to inform practitioners, researchers, educators, and policymakers by promoting evidence-based practices and encouraging innovation in psychiatric care. The ultimate goal is to enhance mental health outcomes globally by fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing among mental health professionals and institutions.

Authors are requested to submit manuscripts online at Submit Manuscript or Send as an e-mail attachment to the Editorial Office at editorialoffice@confseries.net

Editorial and Publication Process

ConfSeries Journals is committed to maintaining an efficient, transparent, and quality-focused editorial workflow to support the dissemination of scholarly research.

The journal aims to provide authors with a transparent and structured publication process while ensuring that all submissions undergo appropriate editorial assessment and peer review procedures. Editorial timelines may vary depending on the scope of the manuscript, reviewer availability, revision requirements, and the overall review process.

Authors may choose to publish through the journal's standard publication workflow, which includes editorial screening, peer review, revisions (where required), copyediting, and final publication.

All submissions are evaluated based on scientific quality, originality, ethical compliance, and relevance to the journal's scope. The editorial process is designed to maintain academic integrity and ensure consistency in publication standards.

Accepted manuscripts proceed through production stages including formatting, proof review, DOI assignment, and online publication.

Authors retain the copyright of their published work, and final articles are made available through the journal's open-access publishing model to support global accessibility and scholarly communication.

The journal publishes articles in digital formats suitable for online dissemination and digital accessibility, including PDF and other standard publishing formats where applicable.

The editorial team is committed to following recognized scholarly publishing practices and maintaining transparency throughout the publication process.

Our Peer Review Process

Confseries follows a structured editorial and peer-review process designed to ensure academic quality, ethical integrity, and timely publication. Each manuscript progresses through clearly defined stages,as illustrated in the peer review workflow.

Manuscript Submission
Authors submit their manuscripts through the Confseries submission platform. All submissions must comply with the journal's scope, author instructions, and ethical standards.

Editorial Office Initial Check
Each new submission undergoes an initial assessment by the editorial office to confirm:

  • Relevance to the journal's aims and scope
  • Completeness of required files and declarations
  • Compliance with formatting and submission guidelines
  • Originality through plagiarism screening
  • Absence of major ethical or legal concerns

Manuscripts identified with major plagiarism, duplicate submission, or serious ethical issues are rejected at this stage without external review. Submissions meeting basic requirements proceed to peer review.

Peer Review Initiation

After passing the initial screening:

  • A qualified editor is assigned to the manuscript
  • Independent reviewers are selected based on subject expertise
  • The manuscript is formally sent for peer evaluation
Confseries follows a single-anonymized peer review model to ensure objective and unbiased assessment.

Reviewer Assessment
Reviewers critically evaluate the manuscript focusing on:

  • Scientific originality and relevance
  • Methodological rigor and data integrity
  • Clarity of presentation and organization
  • Ethical compliance and reporting quality
Reviewers submit detailed comments and recommendations to support editorial decision-making.

Editorial Decision
Based on reviewer feedback and editorial evaluation, one of the following decisions is issued:

  • Accepted
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Rejected
Authors receive consolidated comments from both editors and reviewers explaining the decision.

Revision and Re-evaluation
For manuscripts requiring revision:

  • Authors submit a revised manuscript addressing all comments
  • A point-by-point response document is required
  • Major revisions may be reassessed by the original reviewers
Failure to adequately address concerns may result in rejection at this stage.

Acceptance and Publication
Manuscripts accepted for publication proceed to the production phase, which includes:

  • Copyediting and proofreading
  • DOI assignment
  • Final author approval
  • Online publication and dissemination

Ethical and Editorial Integrity

  • Ensuring fair and unbiased peer review
  • Maintaining strict confidentiality of submissions
  • Providing ethical oversight at every editorial stage
  • Ensuring transparent communication with authors with authors

The Confseries peer-review workflow reflects a clear, ethical, and structured editorial process, ensuring that every manuscript is evaluated rigorously before publication.